Friday, February 13th, 2009
Last year, a culinary philosophical question was posed at work:
Considering food that is actually prepared (unlike cereals and what not), name a food that wouldn’t go with one of these pillars of epicurean wonder:
- Cheese
- Bacon
- Ranch
- Chocolate
I’m not sure anyone has come up with a viable answer as of yet. Remember, when considering such things that you have to forgo your own culinary hang-ups. For example, I’m not a big fan of Ranch, yet I have the understanding that it would be suitable to get your Ranch on with a burger.
Discuss.
Tags: culinary, food, philosophy
February 13th, 2009 at 3:56 pm
A Choco-Taco (that Taco Time used to make) with ranch.. eew
February 13th, 2009 at 4:15 pm
It doesn’t have to go with all of those things, just one… Can you come up with a food that doesn’t with one of those?
February 13th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
mmmm I want a Choco-Taco
February 13th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
Jess has never had one… I’m always in the look out for ome
February 13th, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Maybe fish? This is a tough question, though.
February 13th, 2009 at 9:52 pm
I don’t know, i have had some delicious parmisan halibut…
February 13th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Scallops au chocolat?
February 15th, 2009 at 10:39 am
Does this mean I have to take cereal of the list of foods that I am able to cook?
February 15th, 2009 at 11:12 am
Yeah, you’re right. I’ve had (and enjoyed) anchovies on pizza. I guess you found the magic four foods!